Ông Trump nêu khả năng kích hoạt luật để điều thêm quân tới các thành phố  Mỹ - Báo VnExpress

A palpable tension is gripping the United States as a convergence of political firestorms threatens to unravel the nation’s sense of stability. From the controversial deployment of military personnel in major American cities to a government shutdown crippling essential services, and from an unprecedented assault on press freedom to a high-stakes congressional showdown over the infamous Epstein files, the country finds itself navigating a crisis of leadership, trust, and institutional integrity.

The most jarring of these developments is the sight of National Guard troops, clad in camouflage, patrolling the streets of cities like Los Angeles, Portland, and Chicago. President Trump has authorized their deployment, framing the move as a pre-emptive strike against a “fabricated crisis” he claims was spinning out of control. However, this action was taken in direct opposition to the wishes of state and local officials, who have strongly condemned it as an unnecessary and dangerous federal overreach.

The President’s response to the dissent from Illinois’s governor and mayor was not one of negotiation, but a call for them to be jailed—a statement that has sent shockwaves through the political landscape. This aggressive strategy is reportedly the brainchild of Stephen Miller, Trump’s deputy chief of staff, who is said to be passionately driving an agenda to turn the country into a militarized zone. The administration is even said to be considering invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807, a rarely used law that would grant the president the power to use the military to enforce his rules on American soil.

While citizens grapple with the image of troops in their neighborhoods, they are also contending with the very real consequences of a government shutdown now entering its second week. The stalemate is causing immense headaches for millions, perhaps most acutely in the nation’s airports. Air traffic control centers in Philadelphia, Las Vegas, Chicago, and other major hubs are reporting critical staff shortages as controllers, working without pay, are increasingly calling in sick. The FAA has acknowledged the strain, raising serious concerns about the safety and reliability of air travel.

The shutdown also carries the threat of mass firings. While the administration has promised to downsize the federal workforce, one White House official admitted they have hesitated to act, stating, “We do not want to appear gleeful about people losing their jobs.” This sentiment, however, seems not to extend to the administration’s critics in the media.

In a move that legal scholars and civil liberties advocates have called a direct violation of the First Amendment, President Trump has publicly called for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to investigate and potentially revoke the broadcast licenses of networks like ABC and NBC for their critical coverage of his administration. At a recent Senate hearing, Nevada Senator Jackie Rosen delivered a powerful rebuke. “This is the clearest possible violation of the First Amendment,” she declared. “This is government censorship by our president. Plain and simple. It’s what they do in Russia. It’s what they do in North Korea. It is not what we do in a democracy.”

Meanwhile, the halls of Congress are the stage for yet another political drama, this one with undertones of a dark and sprawling conspiracy. House Speaker Mike Johnson has refused to swear in a newly elected Democratic representative from Arizona who won a special election. This procedural delay is far from routine; her vote is widely seen as the deciding factor in whether to release the long-awaited Epstein files. Johnson’s refusal to seat her, even though precedents exist for doing so while the House is out of session, has fueled accusations that he is deliberately obstructing the release to protect powerful figures whose names may appear on the infamous list.

In a bizarre twist, this has created an unlikely alliance, with firebrand Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene breaking from her party to demand the files be released. “There is no amount of pressure they can put on me to force me to step in line on that,” Greene stated, positioning herself as a lone voice of reason on the issue within the GOP. While Greene and Democrats focus on this matter of intense public interest, Speaker Johnson has appeared more concerned with the Super Bowl halftime show, publicly criticizing the choice of artist Bad Bunny and suggesting 82-year-old country singer Lee Greenwood would be a more suitable role model for the nation’s youth.

The turmoil extends deep into the Department of Justice, where the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, a frequent target of Trump’s ire, is raising alarms about the weaponization of the legal system. Comey has been charged with leaking classified information, yet investigators previously found insufficient evidence, and the prosecution’s lead witness maintains no classified information was ever leaked.

The case took a more dramatic turn when the original prosecutor, a Trump appointee himself, refused to take the case due to the lack of evidence and the ethical implications of a vindictive prosecution. In his place, the administration brought in Lindsey Halligan, a former insurance lawyer and Miss Colorado third runner-up with no prosecutorial experience. This appointment has been widely mocked and condemned as evidence that the prosecution is based not on legal merit, but on political retribution.

Amid these serious institutional crises, the political landscape is also populated by surreal sideshows that underscore the chaotic nature of the times. The Senate recently confirmed former football star Herschel Walker as the new ambassador to the Bahamas, an appointment based on qualifications that appear to be little more than his fame and ownership of a bathing suit. In another strange development, the QAnon Shaman, the horned figure from the January 6th Capitol riot, is now suing his former idol, President Trump, for an astronomical $40 trillion, further blurring the lines between political protest and absurdist theater.

From armed soldiers on Main Street to a constitutional crisis over press freedom, and from a paralyzed government to a justice system accused of being a political weapon, the events of the past week paint a portrait of a nation at a crossroads. The threads of political division, institutional decay, and populist anger are weaving together into a tapestry of unprecedented uncertainty, leaving citizens to wonder where the country is headed and if its democratic foundations can withstand the strain.