The WNBA is once again under fire after an explosive sequence involving Indiana Fever’s Sophie Cunningham, rookie phenom Caitlin Clark, and what many are calling the most biased officiating in recent memory.

In a heated matchup between the Indiana Fever and a rival team, Clark appeared to be the repeated target of aggressive, borderline dangerous plays—including an incident where she was allegedly poked in the eye during a rebound scramble.

Your Triple Crown': Caitlin Clark Reacts To Sophie Cunningham's New  Beginning With Indiana Fever | Yardbarker

The referees? No whistle. No review. No call.

That’s when Sophie Cunningham snapped.

Charging across the court to confront both the offending player and the referees, Cunningham could be seen on camera yelling:

“Open your eyes—she just went for hers!”

Instead of addressing the potential eye gouge, the refs turned on Cunningham—assessing her a technical foul for “aggressive conduct” and later ejecting her after a second heated exchange.

The crowd erupted in boos.

The Fever bench stood in disbelief.

And social media? It exploded.

#ProtectCaitlin and #FreeSophie began trending within minutes, with fans accusing WNBA officials of ignoring repeated cheap shots aimed at Clark—while punishing the players who step up to defend her.

“How is Sophie the one getting punished when she’s the only one actually playing with integrity?” one fan posted.

In the post-game press conference, Cunningham didn’t hold back.

“This is getting ridiculous. You let players jab her in the face and then penalize me for saying something? I’d do it again. Every time.”

The alleged “eye poke” incident was replayed on multiple sports shows, with analysts agreeing that it appeared intentional—a swipe directly toward Clark’s face as she secured the ball.

Even former WNBA stars are speaking out.

“That wasn’t defense. That was dirty,” said one retired player on national TV. “And what’s worse is the refs acting like they didn’t see it.”

Fever head coach Christy Sides backed her players wholeheartedly.

“I’m proud of Sophie. She’s not just here to play—she’s here to protect her team. What happened on that court was a disgrace.”

As for Clark, she didn’t say much about the altercation, simply stating:

“I appreciate Sophie. That’s a real teammate right there.”

The WNBA has yet to comment officially on the officiating or the technical fouls assessed during the game. However, multiple insiders report that the league office is “reviewing the footage” and “aware of the fan outrage.”

Outrage might be an understatement.

A petition demanding disciplinary review of the referees involved has already reached over 50,000 signatures. Fans are calling for accountability—not just for the missed calls, but for what they describe as “a pattern of bias against Clark and her defenders.”

“It’s starting to look personal,” one sports blogger wrote. “The league has to get this under control before it turns into chaos.”

Meanwhile, Cunningham’s ejection seems only to have strengthened her bond with Clark and her status among Fever fans.

“She’s not just a role player anymore—she’s a warrior,” one supporter wrote. “That’s our enforcer.”

As tensions rise and the season heats up, fans are demanding fairness, transparency, and most of all—protection for players who continue to take the court night after night under increasingly hostile conditions.

One thing’s for sure:
Sophie Cunningham might’ve been tossed from the game—
But she just won the respect of an entire fanbase.

And the referees? The spotlight is now squarely on them.