In a stunning twist that has reignited one of the most polarizing rivalries in women’s sports, ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith dropped a bombshell on First Take—claiming that WNBA star Caitlin Clark made intentional, disrespectful gestures and remarks toward Angel Reese during a recent game between the Indiana Fever and the Chicago Sky.

And now? The WNBA is officially investigating.

The Moment That Sparked It All

Caitlin Clark Will Help Push WNBA's TV Deal Past $200 Million Says Stephen A. Smith - The SportsRush

It began as what seemed like just another physical moment on the court: a flagrant foul by Clark on Reese. While both players initially downplayed the incident as “just basketball,” Stephen A. Smith isn’t buying it.

On air, Smith declared the incident was not only intentional, but part of a “pattern of premeditated disrespect” from Clark toward Reese.

“This wasn’t heat-of-the-moment,” Smith said. “This was calculated. This was personal.”

The Allegations – And the Missing Pieces

Smith claims to possess evidence of derogatory gestures and comments made by Clark during the game—though he did not present the footage during the segment. The lack of public proof has only added fuel to the fire, leaving fans to speculate: What does Stephen A. actually know? And why now?

Reactions Pour In – From the WNBA, Teams, and Players

The WNBA confirmed it has opened an internal review under its “No Space for Hate” policy. Both the Indiana Fever and Chicago Sky voiced support for the investigation and a fair resolution.

WNBA MVP Breanna Stewart urged fans and players to “respect the space” of competition, noting that while rivalries are part of the game, “lines should never be crossed.”

Fans Are Divided – And So Is the Narrative

Public opinion is split. Some believe Clark crossed a line and that Smith is shining a necessary light on deeper issues. Others accuse Smith of overhyping a routine play to manufacture controversy.

But beneath the surface, larger conversations have reignited: media bias, racial double standards, and the vastly different ways Reese and Clark have been portrayed by fans and press alike.

A 2024 media study cited in The Atlantic found that Reese received disproportionately negative coverage for similar actions, suggesting that race continues to influence narratives in women’s sports.

What Happens Next?

The WNBA’s decision in this case could set a precedent—not only for player conduct, but for how the league confronts issues of race, respect, and rivalry in the public eye.

Will Caitlin Clark face disciplinary action?
Is Stephen A. Smith stirring the pot—or exposing a painful truth?
And what unseen footage, if any, could change the game?

One thing is certain: this story is far from over.